July 11, 2012

RESHARED POST FROM PAM GRIFFITH

“While the gendered politics of technology access and the creative ways in which children are able to work as embodied interfaces is interesting – and perhaps needs more space than is afforded here – what remains interesting to me is how this story disrupts the regular narratives of techno-euphoria. It cannot be explained away merely in terms of usage. It cannot be used to claim radical social change in community and gendered relationships. It is difficult to make a technology-empowerment argument though this. What is perhaps most interesting is that it shows how we need to start thinking about digital technologies as producing new ecosystems that reconfigure our understanding of who we are and the roles we play in developing social relationality. The digital natives in these stories are not merely the children – though their embodied interface produces startling insights into how personal relationships with technologies are produced. The men who have access to the phones and have mastered digital literacy in navigating through these phones, the women who become the last-mile consumers who have found creative ways of staying connected despite their lack of access, and the children who become the nodes in this technology-information infrastructure, are all digital natives of a certain kind. They might not have claimed that identity and indeed might never want to. And yet, the very conditions of everyday life, as they are mediated by the presence of digital technologies in Banni, help us understand the social structures and information relationships in ways which are more complex than theorized by our techno-euphoric attention to network visualizations which are heavily determined by usage and action.” via +Michael Chui Pam Griffith originally shared this post: “These children would not usually be recognized as digital natives because they are not particularly tech savvy and they do […]
July 10, 2012

RESHARED POST FROM JEFFREY J DAVIS

“Salesforce.com won’t disclose exactly how the Influencer algorithm works. It’s more than just tabulating number of posts, though. In fact, workers could actually be penalized for sheer volume, if colleagues don’t consider their content useful. “We don’t want people being noisy,” Chatter general manager Kendall Collins tells Fast Company. Instead, the algorithm looks at things like how many Likes a post gets or how often it’s re-shared. “It surveys all the activities you’re involved in and weighs them differently,” King says. He adds that managers wanting to evaluate worker influence will probably want to combine the machine-generated score with the output of an explicit recognition system, like Salesforce.com’s newly acquired Rypple, which allows employees to give each other badges for great work. When you add a system like Rypple, King says, “you get a complete picture–not only what’s derived [from activity on the system] but also what’s declared by peers and managers.”” #attentioneconomy via +Rebecca Spizzirri Jeffrey J Davis originally shared this post: Interesting , companies begin to use internal Klout-like influence ranking systems to include influence in performance assessments. Measuring An Employee’s Worth? Consider Influence The performance review of the future will include services like Salesforce.com’s Chatter and its Influencers feature, which measures how much weight you carry among your peers. Measuring An Employee’s Worth? Consider Influence The performance review of the future will include services like Salesforce.com’s Chatter and its Influencers feature, which measures how much weight you carry among your peers.
July 4, 2012

ATTENTION ECONOMY VIGNETTES CHAPTER 1: MA

Attention Economy Vignettes I recently posted a long excerpt from +Bruce Sterling‘s wonderful novel _The Caryatids_ as an example of a functioning #attentioneconomy in action. Sterling’s lucid prose highlights many of the functional aspects of an attention economy, including the central of role of experts and self-directed education, and the importance of Augmented Reality overlays for demonstrating the fruits of economic labor (through a visualization Sterling calls “Glory”). You can read the excerpt here: https://plus.google.com/117828903900236363024/posts/XjKhhHH8uJ9 Unfortunately, Sterling’s vision of the future takes place a few decades after the demise of the world’s governments and economic infrastructure, following devastating wholesale environmental collapse. I’d hope that we might start preparing for an Attention Economy in time to prevent such devastation, if at all possible. For this reason, I’ve been thinking about ways to visualize and present the Attention Economy in a more compelling way than my long, dense academic discussions. The easier it is to imagine alternative organizational structures, the faster people will start preparing for its eventuality. To that end, I’ve started compiling a series of science fiction shorts describing a not-so-distant future that operates on its basic principles. I’m pretty busy with my summer job at the moment, but I have a few of these shorts in the bag and I’ll be posting them over the next few weeks to get some feedback and maybe start some discussions. This is my first real attempt at fiction, and I’m not very comfortable with the medium, so any comments and suggestions are appreciated! ______________________ Chapter 1: Ma The light bulb is out. The blackened bulb in the lamp on my bedside dresser went unchanged for a week, and when I opened my eyes this morning it was the first thing that entered my field of vision. I witnessed it die a week […]
July 3, 2012

DECLARATION OF INTERNET FREEDOM +ELECTRONIC…

Declaration of Internet Freedom +Electronic Frontier Foundation PREAMBLE We believe that a free and open Internet can bring about a better world. To keep the Internet free and open, we call on communities, industries and countries to recognize these principles. We believe that they will help to bring about more creativity, more innovation and more open societies. We are joining an international movement to defend our freedoms because we believe that they are worth fighting for. Let’s discuss these principles — agree or disagree with them, debate them, translate them, make them your own and broaden the discussion with your community — as only the Internet can make possible. Join us in keeping the Internet free and open. http://www.internetdeclaration.org/freedom http://www.reddit.com/r/internetdeclaration via +Charlie Hoover via http://lifehacker.com/5923111/let-the-eff-convince-you-to-sign-the-declaration-of-internet-freedom #declaration of #internet #freedom #eff #digitalvalues
July 3, 2012

ATTENTION ECONOMY VIGNETTES CHAPTER 1 I…

Attention Economy Vignettes Chapter 1 I recently posted a long excerpt from +Bruce Sterling‘s wonderful novel The Caryatids as an example of a functioning #attentioneconomy in action. Sterling’s lucid prose highlights many of the functional aspects of an attention economy, including the central of role of experts and self-directed education, and the importance of Augmented Reality overlays for demonstrating the fruits of economic labor (through a visualization Sterling calls “Glory”). You can read the excerpt here: https://plus.google.com/117828903900236363024/posts/XjKhhHH8uJ9 Unfortunately, Sterling’s vision of the future takes place a few decades after the demise of the world’s governments and economic infrastructure, following a devastating environmental collapse. I’d hope that we might start preparing for an Attention Economy in time to prevent such devastation, if at all possible. For this reason, I’ve been thinking about ways to visualize and present the Attention Economy in a more compelling way than my long, dense academic discussions. The easier it is to imagine alternative organizational structures, the faster people will start preparing for their eventuality. To that end, I’ve started compiling a series of science fiction shorts describing a not-so-distant future that operates on its basic principles. I’m pretty busy with my summer job at the moment, but I have a few of these shorts in the bag and I’ll be posting them over the next few weeks to get some feedback and maybe start some discussions. This is my first attempt at fiction, and I’m not very comfortable with the medium, so any comments and suggestions are appreciated! ____________________ Chapter 1: Ma The light bulb is out. The blackened bulb in the lamp on my bedside dresser went unchanged for a week, and when I opened my eyes this morning it was the first thing that entered my field of vision. I witnessed it die a […]
July 1, 2012

RESHARED POST FROM KYLE BROOM

kyle broom originally shared this post: Short film inspired by the detention conditions of Bradley Manning.
July 1, 2012

RESHARED POST FROM KOEN DE PAUS

Koen De Paus originally shared this post: The Sentineli, a living memory of our history Part 2 Random thoughts on tribes vs mobs and how machines relate to both. “It is in the long run essential to the growth of any new and high civilization that small groups of men can escape from their neighbors and from their government, to go and live as they please in the wilderness. A truly isolated, small, and creative society will never again be possible on this planet.” ~Freeman J. Dyson For us city dwellers it is hard to imagine just how different a life in isolation must be. A lifestyle completely independent from the outside world where you have to be one with nature if you hope to survive. When given the choice, most of us would not go back to such a life. Our tribe has grown to include millions of people and we no longer farm our own fields but instead count on others to provide us with the goods required for life. From water and food to jobs and justice, we depend on the web that society has built. We have outsourced many tasks of our early tribal lifestyle to the mob and the mob or system has offloaded many tasks onto technology. We are now at a point where an EMP blast would cause a mass extinction. In a small tribe you are directly connected with the consequences of your actions. You need to catch a fish and know how to make a fire because you want to feed your family tonight. No bosses, no money, action > reaction. Our system is so complex that it can be very hard to keep track of actions and consequences. If you work at a chemical plant that produces plastics, you might […]
June 29, 2012

VIA +WINCHELL CHUNG

via +Winchell Chung
June 29, 2012

A COMPLEX SYSTEMS SCIENCE APPROACH TO HEALTHCARE…

A Complex Systems Science Approach to Healthcare Costs and Quality by Y. Bar-Yam at NECSI “There is a mounting crisis in delivering affordable healthcare in the US. For decades, key decision makers in the public and private sectors have considered cost-effectiveness in healthcare a top priority. Their actions have focused on putting a limit on fees, services, or care options. However, they have met with limited success as costs have increased rapidly while the quality isn’t commensurate with the high costs. A new approach is needed. Here we provide eight scientifically-based steps for improving the healthcare system. The core of the approach is promoting the best use of resources by matching the people and organization to the tasks they are good at, and providing the right incentive structure. Harnessing costs need not mean sacrificing quality. Quality service and low costs can be achieved by making sure the right people and the right organizations deliver services. As an example, the frequent use of emergency rooms for non-emergency care demonstrates the waste of resources of highly capable individuals and facilities resulting in high costs and ineffective care. Neither free markets nor managed care guarantees the best use of resources. A different oversight system is needed to promote the right incentives. Unlike managed care, effective oversight must not interfere with the performance of care. Otherwise, cost control only makes care more cumbersome. The eight steps we propose are designed to dramatically improve the effectiveness of the healthcare system, both for those who receive services and those who provide them.” More: http://necsi.edu/research/healthcare/healthcaresteps.html via +Kyle Crider #complexity #complexityscience #healthcare
June 28, 2012

USING PREZI AS A WHITEBOARD IN MY CLASSROOM…

Using Prezi as a Whiteboard In my classroom there is no easy way to both use the chalkboard and the LCD projector at the same time. Although I love chalkboards, today I decided to commit to the projector. I kept a Prezi editing window open, and took notes as I would on a whiteboard. I usually draw pictures and obsessively underline things and couldn’t do that as easily here. However, it resulted in a pretty neat document that worked really great for review at the end of the class day. You can dive into the Prezi here: http://prezi.com/ja-cumg1hhbd/philosophy-of-mind/ Any suggestions on other classroom whiteboard software that might work better?
June 27, 2012

RESHARED POST FROM CHRIS ROBINSON

#ants are #awesome via +Rebecca Spizzirri Chris Robinson originally shared this post: Although many ant species use chemical trails to organise themselves into food-collecting groups, the big-headed ant has an “extreme” chemical enlisting strategy, says the University of Sussex team. “When an ant finds something delicious,” he said, “she has to lay a trail really quickly, because competition is fierce. “The pheromone trail starts working immediately. Any ants caught in its net are funnelled towards the food item.” Make sure you check out the video. I could definitely use an “extreme” chemical enlisting strategy! How ants enlist emergency help Brazilian ants deploy emergency “chemical nets” to drag swarms of their nestmates into helping them carry large food items, a study shows.
June 27, 2012

ROBOT HAND BEATS YOU AT ROCK, PAPER, SCISSORS…

Robot Hand Beats You at Rock, Paper, Scissors 100% Of The Time “It only takes a single millisecond for the robot to recognize what shape your hand is in, and just a few more for it to make the shape that beats you, but it all happens so fast that it’s more or less impossible to tell that the robot is waiting until you commit yourself before it makes its move, allowing it to win 100% of the time. You might be thinking that you could fool the system by changing your mind halfway through, but my guess is that the hand and vision system are faster than your reflexes could ever be, and that it would be trivial for the robot to adapt to any creative moves that happens on the human end.” More: http://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/artificial-intelligence/robot-hand-beats-you-at-rock-paper-scissors-100-of-the-time via +Chryle Elieff Janken (rock-paper-scissors) Robot with 100% winning rate
February 10, 2013

METAPHYSICS, MODELS, AND PRAGMATISM

My response a draft of Jon’s: The more I read it, the more I hate this paper. It is actually a stunning example of historically ignorant and completely unsatisfying metaphysics. It is also just bad philosophy. I wrote you a drunken text about it last night, and let me continue to be belligerent about it here. This whole issue was gone over quite thoroughly in post-positivistic philosophy of science, sometimes as a discussion of reduction (which I know you are familiar with) but also as a discussion of the unity of the sciences, or the autonomy of the special sciences. There’s even an SEP article about it: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-unity/ It mentions, among other things, about philosophy of science pre-1990 (which might never have happened from the look of your paper), and Ian Hacking’s critique of the unity of the sciences from the early 90s, which is worth knowing, relevant to this discussion, and also completely absent. You’ll also see that a range of pluralistic positions are described in the encyclopedia entry, none of which make an appearance in your paper. I see no substantive progress being made by your work here that isn’t already in the literature available in the field. Instead, I see a paper written by someone who has yet to realize that the field exists and has some homework to do. This is one of the major problems with philosophical practice, especially in metaphysics, today: some kids who know nothing of the history of ideas have an idea that they think is novel, but has actually been studied carefully for years; but because they know nothing of history also know nothing of the problems with various formulations of the views, and therefore carelessly recapitulate so many of the mistakes that so many people already worked so hard to […]
February 8, 2013

SOCIAL MEDIA IS A FACT OF LIFE FOR SOCIAL MOVEMENTS

A reply to Evgeny Morozov. There are two ways to be wrong about the internet. One is to argue it doesn’t live up to its hype. Speculative futurism and unabashed mysticism have become commonplace in discussions of technological change, and it isn’t hard to find people ready to claim that the internet is a panacea heralding everything up to and including immortality. In such an environment, one need only be moderately critical about the internet to position oneself as a pariah standing against a swarm of naive technoidealists. Democracy doesn’t even work on Wikipedia, the argument goes, and so it is foolish to think that “liquid democracy” will change the form of legitimate governance (read: the nation-state) in any substantive way, hype be damned. The problem with such criticisms is that they treat the possibility of internet-generated change as all-or-nothing: either the internet meets the expectations of its most wide-eyed advocates, or it is a waste of time with all the sociopolitical importance of a video game. There’s no room in this view for registering the subtle cultural shifts that can change the practice of legitimate governance over time, or for understanding how the ideals of extremists can change the discourse even when their ideals are not achieved. The other, more insidious way of being wrong about the internet is to accept that the internet changes things subtly, and proceed to argue that the old ways were better. That’s what I take Evgeny Morozov to be doing in this article, and it’s important to see how regressive his arguments (and the institutions they support) are. Just to be sure I have the argument right, I’ll try to charitably reconstruct its key points before blowing them to pieces. Morozov’s core argument against Johnson’s “internet-centrism” is that it is shallow: It’s not […]
October 25, 2012

BIG IDEA: ATTENTION ECONOMY

Without a doubt, my favorite “big idea” is the Attention Economy. Attention Economy is a protocol for social organization and economic management that works by accounting for what all the system’s users attend to. The idea is one part Augmented Reality, one part Internet of Things, one part Use-Theory of Value, and one part Cognitive Surplus. I am utterly convinced that an attention-economic system will ultimately replace both money and centralized governance as the dominant method for large-scale organizational management, and moreover that it is the only method for ensuring a timely and effective response to global climate change andsustainability. There’s a lot to say about how such a thing works, but the best illustrationmes from existing science fiction, in Bruce Sterling’s 2009 novel The Caryatids. The novel takes place 50 years in the future, after massive environmental and social collapse; presumably, these system failures didn’t prevent the march of technological progress. I want to quote a passage at length, and then I’ll give some discussion and links to more information below. When they had docked at Mljet in their slow-boat refugee barges, they’d been given their spex and their ID tags. As proper high-tech pioneers, they soon found themselves humbly chopping the weeds in the bold Adriatic sun. The women did this because of the architecture of participation. They worked like furies. As the camp women scoured the hills, their spex on their kerchiefed heads, their tools in their newly blistered hands, the spex recorded whatever they saw, and exactly how they went about their work. Their labor was direct and simple: basically, they were gardening. Middle-aged women had always tended to excel at gardening. The sensorweb identified and labeled every plant the women saw through their spex. So, day by day, and weed by weed, these women were […]
October 1, 2012

THE LAST LAST SUPPER: HOW TO KILL RELIGION WITH RESPECT

I teach at a summer camp for gifted students called the Center for Talented Youth. The program encourages bright and creative teenagers to engage each other in an active learning community, and it puts particularly strong emphasis on self-expression and respect for diversity. The camps have been running for decades and students often return for multiple summers in a row, so by this point there are a body of rich traditions that the students carry over every year, including a strange communal rendition of American Pie, and wearing bathrobes and carrying towels on Thursdays in honor of Hitchhiker’s Guide. At the site in Lancaster, PA, which is the largest of the camp sites and where I’ve taught a philosophy of mind class for the last 7 years, the rituals included a tradition that until this year was known as The Last Supper. This year, CTY formally forbid the students from continuing the tradition in its existing form. Here is the official statement from Stu Gluck, an Assistant Director for CTY and who oversees the Lancaster site, which was sent to employees a few weeks before the summer session began: Gathering to celebrate the summer’s experience is perfectly appropriate. However, the use of religious symbolism, which has increased over the years, has not always been perceived as respectful of the diverse religious beliefs of students in our program. This year students will be expected to find a way to celebrate their experience that does not include religious symbolism. I think Stu’s reasoning here is consistent with CTY’s overall teaching philosophy, and on the surface there’s nothing that seems inappropriate. I also understand perfectly well the kind of legal and political pressure that CTY is under to adopt such a policy; I remember hearing many people remark that they were surprised the […]
September 20, 2012

HOW THE INTERNET FEELS

// First a quote, then a rant below. This quote comes from the Christof Koch interview in the Atlantic > The Internet now already has a couple of billion nodes. Each node is a computer. Each one of these computers contains a couple of billion transistors, so it is in principle possible that the complexity of the Internet is such that it feels like something to be conscious. I mean, that’s what it would be if the Internet as a whole has consciousness. Depending on the exact state of the transistors in the Internet, it might feel sad one day and happy another day, or whatever the equivalent is in Internet space. > You’re serious about using these words? The Internet could feel sad or happy? > Koch: What I’m serious about is that the Internet, in principle, could have conscious states. Now, do these conscious states express happiness? Do they express pain? Pleasure? Anger? Red? Blue? That really depends on the exact kind of relationship between the transistors, the nodes, the computers. It’s more difficult to ascertain what exactly it feels. But there’s no question that in principle it could feel something. This is incredibly sloppy work. It just won’t do for any kind of serious analysis. First of all, the fact that the internet has millions of nodes makes no real difference to the complexity of the system. The billions of grains of sand on a beach can be modeled as a network, but the complexity of that system isn’t particularly remarkable and the number of nodes certainly doesn’t make it comparable to the human mind. Complexity isn’t a a quantitative matter of how many things are hooked together, it is a dynamical matter of what the resulting network does. Brains are interesting because they do interesting things, […]
September 15, 2012

ON IDENTITY, COMMUNITY, AND SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT

// Below was a comment then went on for too long, in response to a conversation sprawled out across a few threads on G+, in response to Jon Lawhead’s criticisms of Judith Butler in light of having recently received the Adorno Prize. Of course I agree with you, Jon, that packaging matters; my argument is that this fact alone doesn’t give much direction for evaluating some particular packaging. The only justification offered in defense of your objections has been admittedly grounded on pure ignorance, which is clearly not suitable ground for drawing policy or funding decisions. If all it took to convince you of the worthlessness of some text is a single rambling or incoherent sentence, then virtually all of science and literature would go down the drain. A few days ago I was struggling with the math in a paper, and John Baez helped me parse it, while still admitting some important notational (that is, packaging) difficulties.Sometimes you have to scavange for the good bits of knowledge, and it isn’t always easy. Your complaints about Butler’s packaging go no deeper than to show that you aren’t willing to do the work to harvest from the results. Its reasonable enough to want others to do it for you, or at least tell you why its important, but when they do by awarding her a prize for the work, you complain that the prize is illegitimate. Its a completely failed position. The fact that you (and your communities) don’t find the packaging useful (yet) doesn’t mean that other communities haven’t found a use where the work has importance and possibly foundational meaning. Human brains aren’t particular good at thinking clearly, but they are really damn good at doing the best they can with what they have available, and then making that […]
August 28, 2012

RESHARED POST FROM POST-SAPIENS, LES ÊTRES…

Post-Sapiens, les êtres technologiques originally shared this post: Dr. Fill, The Crossword Playing Computer Competes At American Crossword Puzzle Tournament | Singularity Hub Inspired by Watson’s success on Jeopardy!, AI specialist Matthew Ginsberg wanted to see if computers could out-duel humans in another language-based game. What he created was Dr. Fill, a software …
July 15, 2012

RESHARED POST FROM JOÃO FIGUEIREDO

João Figueiredo originally shared this post: Simon Schubert’s work is haunting. The German artist folds and unfolds paper until a ‘ghost image’ appears. His recent work includes a collection of more than 100 pictures resembling different views on the interior of a villa. Love how he uses the physical memory of his medium (a source of constant glitches in other artistic traditions) to convey the message. via http://www.lostateminor.com/2012/07/12/simon-schubert-makes-art-by-folding-and-unfolding-paper/ His website (with a huge gallery) is here: http://www.simonschubert.de/papierarbeiten.html
July 11, 2012

RESHARED POST FROM PAM GRIFFITH

“While the gendered politics of technology access and the creative ways in which children are able to work as embodied interfaces is interesting – and perhaps needs more space than is afforded here – what remains interesting to me is how this story disrupts the regular narratives of techno-euphoria. It cannot be explained away merely in terms of usage. It cannot be used to claim radical social change in community and gendered relationships. It is difficult to make a technology-empowerment argument though this. What is perhaps most interesting is that it shows how we need to start thinking about digital technologies as producing new ecosystems that reconfigure our understanding of who we are and the roles we play in developing social relationality. The digital natives in these stories are not merely the children – though their embodied interface produces startling insights into how personal relationships with technologies are produced. The men who have access to the phones and have mastered digital literacy in navigating through these phones, the women who become the last-mile consumers who have found creative ways of staying connected despite their lack of access, and the children who become the nodes in this technology-information infrastructure, are all digital natives of a certain kind. They might not have claimed that identity and indeed might never want to. And yet, the very conditions of everyday life, as they are mediated by the presence of digital technologies in Banni, help us understand the social structures and information relationships in ways which are more complex than theorized by our techno-euphoric attention to network visualizations which are heavily determined by usage and action.” via +Michael Chui Pam Griffith originally shared this post: “These children would not usually be recognized as digital natives because they are not particularly tech savvy and they do […]
July 10, 2012

RESHARED POST FROM JEFFREY J DAVIS

“Salesforce.com won’t disclose exactly how the Influencer algorithm works. It’s more than just tabulating number of posts, though. In fact, workers could actually be penalized for sheer volume, if colleagues don’t consider their content useful. “We don’t want people being noisy,” Chatter general manager Kendall Collins tells Fast Company. Instead, the algorithm looks at things like how many Likes a post gets or how often it’s re-shared. “It surveys all the activities you’re involved in and weighs them differently,” King says. He adds that managers wanting to evaluate worker influence will probably want to combine the machine-generated score with the output of an explicit recognition system, like Salesforce.com’s newly acquired Rypple, which allows employees to give each other badges for great work. When you add a system like Rypple, King says, “you get a complete picture–not only what’s derived [from activity on the system] but also what’s declared by peers and managers.”” #attentioneconomy via +Rebecca Spizzirri Jeffrey J Davis originally shared this post: Interesting , companies begin to use internal Klout-like influence ranking systems to include influence in performance assessments. Measuring An Employee’s Worth? Consider Influence The performance review of the future will include services like Salesforce.com’s Chatter and its Influencers feature, which measures how much weight you carry among your peers. Measuring An Employee’s Worth? Consider Influence The performance review of the future will include services like Salesforce.com’s Chatter and its Influencers feature, which measures how much weight you carry among your peers.
.twitter-timeline.twitter-timeline-rendered { position: relative !important; left: 50%; transform: translate(-50%, 0); }