June 18, 2012

RESHARED POST FROM FREDERIC EMAM-ZADÉ GERARDINO

+Jonathan Zittrain‘s keynote at #roflcon2012 Frederic Emam-Zadé Gerardino originally shared this post:
June 15, 2012

RESHARED POST FROM MATT UEBEL

Matt Uebel originally shared this post: #futurism #singularity #science #circleshare #circle . Realityzealot circle of futurism zealotry. 0_o This is my circle of people that seemed to have expressed an interest in the future, the future of science and technology, and maybe some people that are flat out singlulartarians. If these topics interest you, please add and share this circle. This is the power of g+ folks ^_^
June 14, 2012

THE YEAR’S MOST IMPORTANT TECHNOLOGY STORIES…

The year’s most important technology stories? In one week, I will be at Princeton University to teach my yearly Human Nature and Technology course through Johns Hopkins’ Center For Talented Youth program. It’s basically a summer camp for high school nerds, and our HTEC course covers a range of philosophical issues relevant to human life in today’s technological age. This will be my 7th year teaching the course. It’s a lot of fun! The first assignment is to research the top tech stories of the last year, from the summer of 2011 to today. Last year, students covered the following stories: Ecological disasters (Japan tsunami, Deep Water Horizon spill) Wikileaks Arab Spring Climate Change Autonomous Drone attacks Cyberwar (Stuxnet, Anonymous, etc) The Digital Divide Privacy and Freedom (covered Kentuky vs King, the NC Eugenics program) This list formed after some brainstorming with the students, and then they were let loose in a library to prepare some research on these topics for class presentations. This is a new year, with plenty of new stories. What stories belong on this year’s list? Leave your suggestions in the comments! I’ll leave mine there as well. For more information on the CTY program: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_Talented_Youth
June 14, 2012

RESHARED POST FROM NASA

The luxury of human guidance Competing robots must retrieve samples such as colored tennis balls, blocks of aluminum or rocks spread across a landscape filled with soft soils, rocks, trees and bodies of water — all without human guidance or GPS navigation to simulate the challenges of exploring other planets. The contest is scheduled to take place at the Worcester Polytechnic Institute in Worcester, Mass., from today through Sunday (June 15 – 17). “Rovers that might have to do this someday on Mars or another planet don’t have the luxury of operating with human guidance,” said Mason Peck, NASA’s chief technologist. NASA originally shared this post: Robots! “NASA $1.5 Million Contest Unleashes Robots for Humans” — InnovationDailyNews. Jeremy Hsu writes about NASA’s Centennial Challenges prize competition at Worcester Polytechnic Institute taking place Friday and Saturday on the WPI campus in Worcester, Mass. Public invited to attend and catch a glimpse of the future! NASA’s $1.5 Million Contest Unleashes Robots from Humans A $1.5 million contest encourages smarter rovers capable of retrieving samples on Mars without human guidance.
June 14, 2012

RESHARED POST FROM KEITH KOLB

Just to be absolutely clear, these machines will run on the food you eat. They will be as much a part of your body as anything can be. via +Linda Dean Keith Kolb originally shared this post: +Annika O’Brien ‘s goal of becoming a cyborg is a few steps closer http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/13/mit-engineers-develop-glucose-fuel-cell-for-neural-implants/?utm_source=sendgrid.com&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=website MIT engineers develop glucose-based fuel cell to be used in neural implants We’ve seen fuel cells used in a variety of gadgets — from cars to portable chargers — and while medical devices aren’t exactly
June 14, 2012

RESHARED POST FROM PETER SMALLEY

Peter Smalley originally shared this post: #science #biology #seriousbusiness “I am large, I contain multitudes.” – Walt Whitman There are ten times more non-human cells in your body than there are human cells. Think about that for a moment. Your body is incredibly diverse, a community of cells as populous as the night sky. And though certain cells stand out like constellations, there are multitudes beyond them. You, the individual, are vast beyond comprehension. In this study, 200 scientists from 80 institutions studied 4788 biological samples from 242 healthy adults – and found over ten thousand species represented in what is being called the Human Microbiome Project. “Like 15th century explorers describing the outline of a new continent, HMP researchers employed a new technological strategy to define, for the first time, the normal microbial makeup of the human body,” said NIH Director Francis S. Collins, M.D., Ph.D. This is hardly navel-gazing. The normal complement of microflora that inhabit the human body helps prevent disease, as well as performing many critical cooperative functions for human beings. Understanding of this incredibly varied community may well represent the next major step forward in our understanding of human health. Original paper (full text): http://www.mbl.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/microbiome_huse_nature12.pdf First “map” of the bacterial make-up of humans published | R&D MagFirst “map” of the bacterial make-up of humans published The landmark publication this week of a “map” of the bacterial make-up of healthy humans required the work of 200 scientists, who made sense of more than 5,000 samples of human and bacterial DNA and 3…
June 14, 2012

RESHARED POST FROM GIDEON ROSENBLATT

Money is a bad organization framework. It worked well enough when society was organized around the presumption of private ownership and trade, which accounts for roughly the last ten thousand years or so; its really a legacy issue from the Agricultural Revolution. Remember, that’s less that a fifth of our existence as behaviorally modern humans. The digital age can do better. Digital societies are organized around the dynamics of collaboration and publicity, and those dynamics are better modeled by economies of attention than economies of financial transaction. We need to understand that the #attentioneconomy provides an overall more productive and stable organizational framework than money will ever provide. Money distorts the way we think, and this distortion is literally killing us. The digital age must do better. Moves like these from Google and Apple are early attempts at playing with money as an organizing framework. It’s smart that they are doing something since it is fairly clear that we will be transitioning to cashless economies soon enough; we’re mostly there already. But if we are going cashless anyway, we should at least explore some attempts to go moneyless and start rethinking our organizational strategies from the ground up. More on why markets are counterproductive in the digital age: http://digitalinterface.blogspot.com/2012/05/digital-politics.html Reposted comment from OP Gideon Rosenblatt originally shared this post: The Future of Paying for Things is Apple (and Google) The company that controls mobile is also likely to control the future of paying for stuff. Everything that this article says about Apple is also true for Google. The only real difference is the massive iTunes user base, but Google is working hard on that and has advantages of its own because of its stronger online shopping position. What will Amazon’s response be? I don’t know, but they better be working […]
June 12, 2012

RESHARED POST FROM JOHN KELLDEN

Part of the lesson of this story, I take it, is that “your” song isn’t yours alone, but belongs to the community. But of course the song is just a tool for tracking an individual’s identity over their lifetime. So part of the lesson is that your identity isn’t your own. This lesson is so radically contrary to the existing order of things that it might make one uneasy to state it so explicitly, but better uneasiness than perpetuating the existing order. John Kellden originally shared this post: Our Future Society, part 51: Ubuntu Your Unique Story, Your Song When a woman of the African tribe knows she is pregnant, she goes to the jungle with other women, and together they pray and meditate until you get to “The song of the child”. When a child is born, the community gets together and they sing the child’s song. When the child begins his education, people get together and he sings his song. When they become an adult, they get together again and sing it. When it comes to your wedding, the person hears his song. Finally, when their soul is going from this world, family and friends are approaching and, like his birth, sing their song to accompany it in the “journey”. In the Ubuntu tribe, there is another occasion when men sing the song. If at some point the person commits a crime or aberrant social act, they take him to the center of town and the people of the community form a circle around her. Then they sing “your song.” The tribe recognizes that the correction for antisocial behavior is not punishment, but is the love and memory of his true identity. When we recognize our own song, we have no desire or need to hurt anyone. Your […]
June 12, 2012

RESHARED POST FROM ANIMESH SHARMA

The Philosopher by +Meghan Fitzgerald
June 12, 2012

RESHARED POST FROM ALEX WILD

Leafcutter ants practice the most sophisticated form of ant agriculture, and probably the most sophisticated form of nonhuman agriculture on the planet. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ant-fungus_mutualism “Generalized higher agriculture is practiced by 63 species in two genera and refers to the condition of highly domesticated fungus. The fungi used in higher agriculture cannot survive without its agriculturalists to tend it and has phenotypic changes that allow for increased ease of ant harvesting. Leafcutter agriculture, which is a more highly derived form of higher agriculture, is practiced by 40 species in two genera and has the most recent evolution, originating between 8 and 12 million years ago. Leaf cutters use living biomass as the substrate to feed their fungi, whereas in all other types of agriculture, the fungus requires dead biomass.” Leafcutters have been practicing advanced forms of sustainable agriculture for over 8 million years. Human beings have been doing it for about 10,000 years or so, which is less that .15% of that time. #ants are #awesome Alex Wild originally shared this post: Among the more charming insects I encountered in southern Brazil was Acromyrmex disciger , a furry little leafcutter ant species. Here, a worker carries a cut leaf down a tree trunk. Lighting this shot required a careful balance between fill and back flash. For #wildlifewednesday , curated by +Mike Spinak.
June 12, 2012

RESHARED POST FROM ANDREA GRAZIANO

Andrea Graziano originally shared this post: via +Sakis Koukouvis Crouching Data, Hidden Code: Tracking Emotions with Twitter in Realtime with EmotiMeter Social Media Content Analysis Natural Language Processing Data Mining and Machine learning for large-scale social media GPU based processing, distributed and parallel architectures Online Social Inter…
June 12, 2012

MAGNASANTI TAKEN FROM THE COMMENTS OF THIS…

Magnasanti Taken from the comments of this interesting conversation in +Pascal Wallisch‘s thread: https://plus.google.com/u/0/100279438294886290330/posts/dtoeQH2s73f SIMCITY 3000 – MAGNASANTI – 6 MILLION – ABSOLUTE MAXIMUM.flv
April 4, 2012

RESHARED POST FROM ANDREA KUSZEWSKI

Andrea Kuszewski originally shared this post: Printable Robots: MIT Project Wants to Let You Design and Fabricate Your Own Machines Printable Robots: MIT Project Wants to Let You Design and Fabricate Your Own Machines – IEEE Spectrum The goal is to develop technology to allow an average person to design, customize, and print a functioning robot in a matter of hours
April 4, 2012

RESHARED POST FROM JONATHAN LANGDALE

Jonathan Langdale originally shared this post: Information alone is not persuasion. If people have no choice, how do you get them to change? Are there some people that will simply never change their way of thinking? In order to change a mind with plasticity, you need information, knowledge, language, compatible social norms and most importantly… time. It seems like we should get used to the fact people do not change their mind unless their mind is in a state where it can make the leap. If they can’t, they just can’t yet. My guess is that this fundamental impossibility to accelerate the rate of change in a human brain is the source of much of our frustrations and political problems. Information, facts and well constructed arguments alone are not enough. Otherwise, Christoper Hitchens would have destroyed organized religion by now.
April 4, 2012

RESHARED POST FROM JONATHAN LANGDALE

Jonathan Langdale originally shared this post: A team that includes scientists from USC has built a quantum computer in a diamond, the first of its kind to include protection against “decoherence” – noise that prevents the computer from functioning properly. Professor +Daniel Lidar USC http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Lidar Postdoc Zhihui Wang Their findings will be published on April 5 in Nature. http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-04-quantum-built-diamond.html http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/04/120404161943.htm The chip in the image measures 3mm x 3mm, while the diamond in the center is 1mm x 1mm. (Credit: Courtesy of Delft University of Technology and UC Santa Barbara)
April 4, 2012

SINCE GOOGLE’S WONDERFULLY EXCITING VIDEO…

Since Google’s wonderfully exciting video is so innocent and charming, its probably a good idea to pass this video around again just so we all can be clear where it’s going. #googlex +Project Glass http://vimeo.com/8569187
April 4, 2012

RESHARED POST FROM PROJECT GLASS

#augmentedreality #attentioneconomy #googlex #fanboy Project Glass originally shared this post: We think technology should work for you—to be there when you need it and get out of your way when you don’t. A group of us from Google[x] started Project Glass to build this kind of technology, one that helps you explore and share your world, putting you back in the moment. We’re sharing this information now because we want to start a conversation and learn from your valuable input. So we took a few design photos to show what this technology could look like and created a video to demonstrate what it might enable you to do. Please follow along as we share some of our ideas and stories. We’d love to hear yours, too. What would you like to see from Project Glass? +Babak Parviz +Steve Lee +Sebastian Thrun
April 4, 2012

RESHARED POST FROM REBECCA SEARLES

Rebecca Searles originally shared this post: I think this is adorable Ants Vaccinate One Another To Prevent Epidemics, Colony Study Suggests By: Jennifer Welsh, LiveScience Staff Writer Published: 04/03/2012 05:05 PM EDT on LiveScience Like crowded megacities, busy ant colonies face a high risk of disease outbreaks. New research indicates …
April 5, 2012

RESHARED POST FROM OLAV SMØRHOLM

Read closely, because this is a brilliant application of the #attentioneconomy . This is an example of how we will start preferring attention-based models to other sorts of models and explanations for deciding difficult problems. Wondeful! The de?nitions [of life, IF] are more than often in con?ict with one another. Undeniably, however, most of them do have a point, one or another or several, and common sense suggests that, probably, one could arrive to a consensus, if only the authors, some two centuries apart from one another, could be brought together. One thing, however, can be done – sort of voting in absentia – asking which terms in the de?nitions are the most frequent and, thus, perhaps, re?ecting the most important points shared by many. Such analysis is offered below, revealing those most frequent terms that may be used for tentative formulation of the consensus. Olav Smørholm originally shared this post: Brilliant! Life is short | Byte Size Biology Note that I am diving straight into the subject, and not prefacing this post with a review of the various definitions of life. I assume that this blog’s readers have been exposed to some aspects o…
April 5, 2012

RESHARED POST FROM XAVIER MARQUEZ

This is a very reasonable and careful essay that reflects a lot of the organizational issues I’ve also been thinking about as a result of my work with Occupy. I can say with a bit of confidence that many of these thoughts are shared (if not always explicitly) by many of the protesters I’ve worked with as well. It is an excellent case study for looking at how the organizers are approaching the #attentioneconomy . “The second important instrumental limitation of protest is also pretty obvious, and has to do with the scarcity of the most important resource that voice requires to be effective: time (or, more specifically, coordinated time). Protest works to focus attention; it concentrates the diffuse and uncoordinated dissatisfaction of many into a unified chorus, and amplifies this dissatisfaction in ways that attract the attention of publics that might share some of these dissatisfactions, and of political coalitions that can act to change the circumstances giving rise to them. But in the short run, the attention budget for all issues of interest is limited; attention can be shifted, but not created, since we are a finite number of human beings who live only a finite amount of time. So protesting X means not protesting Y; and protesting X means not doing A, B, and C, at least for the duration of the protest. There is always some other pressing issue that loses out in the competition for attention, some other problem that could be plausibly argued to be more important: to protest is to make a claim about the proper priorities of an institution. (But how could we know?).” Xavier Marquez originally shared this post: I was invited by a student club here at VUW to talk about protest. Not entirely satisfied with these thoughts I jotted […]
April 5, 2012

RESHARED POST FROM MATT UEBEL

Matt Uebel originally shared this post: #RaceAgainstTheMachine . Robots will steal your job, but that’s OK | how to survive the economic collapse and be happy You are about to become obsolete. You think you are special, unique, and that whatever it is that you are doing is impossible to replace. You are wrong. As we speak, millions of algorithms created by …
April 6, 2012

RESHARED POST FROM GERD MOE-BEHRENS

Gerd Moe-Behrens originally shared this post: Leukippos Institute Evolutionary Synthetic Biology by Sergio G. Peisajovich “Signaling networks process vast amounts of environmental information to generate specific cellular responses. As cellular environments change, signaling networks adapt accordingly. Here, I will discuss how the integration of synthetic biology and directed evolution approaches is shedding light on the molecular mechanisms that guide the evolution of signaling networks. In particular, I will review studies that demonstrate how different types of mutations, from the replacement of individual amino acids to the shuffling of modular domains, lead to markedly different evolutionary trajectories, and consequently to diverse network rewiring. Moreover, I will argue that intrinsic evolutionary properties of signaling proteins, such as the robustness of wild type functions, the promiscuous nature of evolutionary intermediates, and the modular decoupling between binding and catalysis, play important roles in the evolution of signaling networks. Finally, I will argue that rapid advances in our ability to synthesize DNA will radically alter how we study signaling network evolution at the genome-wide level.” http://bit.ly/Hd65fd #syntheticbiology #synbio #syntheticbio Evolutionary Synthetic Biology – ACS Synthetic Biology (ACS Publications) Signaling networks process vast amounts of environmental information to generate specific cellular responses. As cellular environments change, signaling networks adapt accordingly. Here, I will discus…
.twitter-timeline.twitter-timeline-rendered { position: relative !important; left: 50%; transform: translate(-50%, 0); }