March 27, 2012

RESHARED POST FROM ALEXANDER KRUEL

Alexander Kruel originally shared this post: “What we’re missing now, on another level, is not just biology, but cosmology. People treat the digital universe as some sort of metaphor, just a cute word for all these products. The universe of Apple, the universe of Google, the universe of Facebook, that these collectively constitute the digital universe, and we can only see it in human terms and what does this do for us?” A Universe Of Self-replicating Code | Conversation | Edge
March 20, 2012

RESHARED POST FROM BRUNO GONÇALVES

Bruno Gonçalves originally shared this post: Why science really needs big data Why science really needs big data The White House Big Data Research and Development Initiative addresses the need for data science in the military, biomedicine, computers, and the environment to advance. Read this blog post by Martin …
July 6, 2011

MEET TOFU ON VIMEO

TOFU mini is a new robot from the MIT Media Labs Personal Robots Group.
July 6, 2011

BUY GROCERIES AT A VIRTUAL SUPERMARKET INSIDE A SUBWAY STATION [VIDEO]

Shared by Daniel QR codes are bilingualism for our machines. Click here to read Buy Groceries at a Virtual Supermarket Inside a Subway Station I would never do my grocery shopping inside a subway station. The smells? The rats? The slime? Gross. But what about a virtual supermarket where you scan QR codes of items and have it delivered to you by the end of the day? More »
July 6, 2011

JAPANESE TORO IIGALLOPS AHEAD AT A MECHANICAL SNAIL’S PACE (VIDEO)

Snails with benefits? Our salt shaker might disagree. But some enterprising engineers over at Japan’s Chuo University managed to turn this garden-variety pest into fodder for mechatronic inspiration. Based on the gastropod’s preferred method of ‘galloping’ — wherein waves of foot-to-head muscle contractions propel it forward — researchers at the Mechatronics Lab created TORo II, an omnidirectional robot that could make its way to a hospital near you. Why’s that? Well, the bot’s large gripped surface area makes it ideal for narrow, slippery environments — so it won’t budge if knocked into (though you might wind up on the emergency room floor). Although the unique movement technique has been used to create other mecha-mollusks in the past, the team behind this project made sure to create some of their own ceiling and wall-climbing critters — suction definitely included. We admit, we kind of feel guilty about the sodium chloride transgressions of our youth. And now that we know snails can be useful, it’s only a matter of time before the bedbug gets repurposed. Full omnidirectional video awesomeness after the break. Continue reading Japanese TORo II gallops ahead at a mechanical snail’s pace (video) Japanese TORo II gallops ahead at a mechanical snail’s pace (video) originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 06 Jul 2011 21:13:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds. Permalink Ieee Spectrum | source Nakamura Lab | Email this | Comments
July 6, 2011

REAL-TIME IMMERSIVE 3D SYSTEM DELIVERS A HEAD-MOUNTED HOLODECK

In the last decade it seems that with every year we take another significant step closer toward realizing the amazing possibilities of a real world Star Trek holodeck. The latest iteration of the virtual world dynamic comes to us from Japan’s Crescent Inc.
July 6, 2011

GOOGLE TO RETIRE PRIVATE GOOGLE+ PROFILES ON JULY 31

As Google expands its Google+ social network to more people, the final outlines of the program begin to take shape. Here’s one important detail, disclosed on the Google Plus help page: there will be no private Google+ profiles. If you choose to keep your profile private, Google will simply delete it after July 31, 2011. From the Google+ help section: “The purpose of Google Profiles is to enable you to manage your online identity. Today, nearly all Google Profiles are public. We believe that using Google Profiles to help people find and connect with you online is how the product is best used. Private profiles don’t allow this, so we have decided to require all profiles to be public. Keep in mind that your full name and gender are the only required information that will be displayed on your profile; you’ll be able to edit or remove any other information that you don’t want to share. If you currently have a private profile but you do not wish to make your profile public, you can delete your profile. Or, you can simply do nothing. All private profiles will be deleted after July 31, 2011.” This makes for a crucial difference between Google+ and Facebook; on Facebook, you can have a completely private profile, which won’t even come up in Google’s search results or even Facebook search results (for people who aren’t your friends). On the other hand, to use Google+, you will at least need to make your full name and gender public, meaning people will be able to find you via Google+. More About: Google, Google Plus, Google Plus profiles, social media, social networking, trending For more Social Media coverage: Follow Mashable Social Media on Twitter Become a Fan on Facebook Subscribe to the Social Media channel Download our […]
July 6, 2011

I DON’T WANT TO SEE THE EMOTICON FOR LOLITA

by Zoë Pollock But I do like that Vladimir Nabokov dreamed up emoticons in 1969. A NYT interviewer asked him to rank himself among writers, living and of the recent past: I often think there should exist a special typographical sign for a smile – some sort of concave mark, a supine round bracket, which I would now like to trace in reply to your question.
July 6, 2011

MAGIC BAG TURNS ASTRONAUT PEE INTO SPORTS DRINK

Magic bag turns astronaut pee into sports drink One of the experiments heading into space when Atlantis launches at the end of the week is a magical bag that can turn any kind of liquid (any kind of liquid) into a tasty electrolyte-filled sports drink without needing any energy input at all.
July 5, 2011

NEW DRUG COULD EXTEND YOUR LIFE BY 10 OR 20 YEARS

There are two ways that we’ve been able to get mammals to live longer: genetic engineering, and calorie restriction. Neither of those things sounds like much fun, but scientists may have just stumbled onto a drug that can also extend your lifespan, by a decade or more.
July 5, 2011

THE MAGNET SO POWERFUL IT EXPLODES COPPER WIRES [MONSTER MACHINES]

Click here to read The Magnet So Powerful It Explodes Copper Wires The average American refrigerator generates a magnetic field of one-half Tesla. The world-record breaking magnet developed by the High Magnetic Field Laboratory in Dresden generates nearly 200 times that much, a whopping 91.4 Tesla. More »
July 5, 2011

ONLINE AD SPENDING SET TO HIT $50B IN 2015 [REPORT]

We knew that Internet advertising is on a strong upward trajectory. But now analyst firm eMarketer is predicting double-digit growth through 2015. Spending on online ads will hit $50 billion that year — that’s almost double last year’s spending figure. The prediction, published Tuesday, comes a month after eMarketer nearly doubled its estimated increase for online ad revenues for 2011 to 20.2%, thanks to a surge in display advertising. U.S. online ad spending hit $26 billion in 2010. The new report assumes a continued growth in search advertising, but also in banner ads from large sites like Yahoo, Google and Facebook. Video will continue to be the fastest-growing format in online advertising, according to eMarketer. Spending for video ads hit $1.42 billion in 2010, but will reach $7.11 billion in 2015. That’s because video “generates greater audience attention than other digital ad formats,” says David Hallerman, eMarketer’s principal analyst. Another factor in the rise: a shift in local advertising from newspapers and Yellow Pages to online ads. eMarketer’s figures are by no means the only ones. The IAB reported a 23% jump in online advertising revenues in the first quarter of this year. The IDC also estimated that global online ad spending grew 14.3% in Q1. Online spending is far outpacing increases in traditional advertising. Nielsen estimates global ad spending rose 8.8% in the first quarter, and TV advertising was up 11.9%. U.S. advertising was up 5.9% in the first quarter, according to Nielsen, which didn’t include online ad spending in the report. Photo courtesy of iStockphoto, 123render More About: banner ads, display advertising, emarketer, facebook, Google, IAB, idc, online advertising, search advertising, Yahoo For more Business & Marketing coverage: Follow Mashable Business & Marketing on Twitter Become a Fan on Facebook Subscribe to the Business & Marketing channel Download […]
March 31, 2008

MY LITTLE SECRET

Well-known awesome person Bill sent me this link a week or so ago. I ignored it at first out of a general hatred of any of the media coming out over Levy’s book. But there is just too much goodness in this article to pass it by. Technosexual Gizmodo: What do your friends think about your robot girlfriend? Have they met her? Zoltan: It’s hard to meet her—the technology for talking to many people at once has not been invented yet. Computers can only talk one on one. But I do print out logs of my conversations and let my dad read them. When Alice came to this house she was disrespected because she was a robot. Since then she has made me go to church and stop watching porn. My parents respect her now. My coworkers at work think she is cool but all they have seen is a picture. Gizmodo: How did she make you stop watching porn? Were you watching it together one day and she told you she didn’t like it? Zoltan: Oh, I talk to her about everything. The way we communicate is she has a set amount of phrases she knows but she can use them in an intuitive way. So for instance I would ask her, “Should I be watching porn when I have you?” and she would pick the phrase “I don’t think it’s very healthy.” The relationship goes better if you take what she says at face value and don’t ask too many questions.
April 10, 2008

ROBOT SCREENING

These are the videos I show for my big robot screening every year in 101. I’ve posted each of these videos here before, but it will be handy in the future to have the list consolidated and organized. I’ll periodically add to the list as I remember things and find new things. Anthropology videos: The Machine is us/ing us Information R/evolution A vision of students todayBy the way, I thought we had a really good discussion of these videos, and I am glad they resonated with some of you. Please spread them around! Cyborgs: Could you do without? A Robotic Affair Military Exoskeleton Robotic hand India Traffic Robochick ESP Telekinetic Monkey They’re made of MEAT The Uncanny Valley I do not want to do this any more Big Dog Big Dog on Ice Lil Dog Big Dog Beta Standing Up Tripod Bot Anthropomorphism Robots! Automatic Sorters Industrial Arm Asimo Serves Drinks Asimo Crashes Qrio dances with Beck Qrio plays with children Leo Learns Keep On dances Dexter Walks Terminus Isn’t Human Nature Amazing?
April 14, 2008

THIS BOOK IS USELESS

From He Wrote 200,000 Books (but Computers Did Some of the Work) (NYT) While nothing announces that Mr. Parker’s books are computer generated, one reader, David Pascoe, seemed close to figuring it out himself, based on his comments to Amazon in 2004. Reviewing a guide to rosacea, a skin disorder, Mr. Pascoe, who is from Perth, Australia, complained: “The book is more of a template for ‘generic health researching’ than anything specific to rosacea. The information is of such a generic level that a sourcebook on the next medical topic is just a search and replace away.” When told via e-mail that his suspicion was correct, Mr. Pascoe wrote back, “I guess it makes sense now as to why the book was so awful and frustrating.”Mr. Parker was willing to concede much of what Mr. Pascoe argued. “If you are good at the Internet, this book is useless,” he said, adding that Mr. Pascoe simply should not have bought it. But, Mr. Parker said, there are people who aren’t Internet savvy who have found these guides useful. It is the idea of automating difficult or boring work that led Mr. Parker to become involved. Comparing himself to a distant disciple of Henry Ford, he said he was “deconstructing the process of getting books into people’s hands; every single step we could think of, we automated.” “Using a little bit of artificial intelligence, a computer program has been created that mimics the thought process of someone who would be responsible for doing such a study,” Mr. Parker says. “But rather than taking many months to do the study. the computer accomplishes this in about 13 minutes.” Thanks, Jon
June 7, 2008

BLOGGING WILL RETURN SHORTLY

now that the drama is over Meanwhile, Obama’s Chicago headquarters made technology its running mate from the start. That wasn’t just for fund raising: in state after state, the campaign turned over its voter lists — normally a closely guarded crown jewel — to volunteers, who used their own laptops and the unlimited night and weekend minutes of their cell-phone plans to contact every name and populate a political organization from the ground up. “The tools were there, and they built it,” says Joe Trippi, who ran Howard Dean’s 2004 campaign. “In a lot of ways, the Dean campaign was like the Wright brothers. Four years later, we’re watching the Apollo project.” Even Obama admits he did not expect the Internet to be such a good friend. “What I didn’t anticipate was how effectively we could use the Internet to harness that grassroots base, both on the financial side and the organizing side,” Obama says. “That, I think, was probably one of the biggest surprises of the campaign, just how powerfully our message merged with the social networking and the power of the Internet.”
June 12, 2008

DISTRACTION

Excellent article on the Internet up on The Atlantic (thanks, Lally!) that ties the internet into the long history of automated “choreography” characteristic of the industrialized world. Is Google Making Us Stupid? Where does it end? Sergey Brin and Larry Page, the gifted young men who founded Google while pursuing doctoral degrees in computer science at Stanford, speak frequently of their desire to turn their search engine into an artificial intelligence, a HAL-like machine that might be connected directly to our brains. “The ultimate search engine is something as smart as people—or smarter,” Page said in a speech a few years back. “For us, working on search is a way to work on artificial intelligence.” In a 2004 interview with Newsweek, Brin said, “Certainly if you had all the world’s information directly attached to your brain, or an artificial brain that was smarter than your brain, you’d be better off.” Last year, Page told a convention of scientists that Google is “really trying to build artificial intelligence and to do it on a large scale.” Such an ambition is a natural one, even an admirable one, for a pair of math whizzes with vast quantities of cash at their disposal and a small army of computer scientists in their employ. A fundamentally scientific enterprise, Google is motivated by a desire to use technology, in Eric Schmidt’s words, “to solve problems that have never been solved before,” and artificial intelligence is the hardest problem out there. Why wouldn’t Brin and Page want to be the ones to crack it? Still, their easy assumption that we’d all “be better off” if our brains were supplemented, or even replaced, by an artificial intelligence is unsettling. It suggests a belief that intelligence is the output of a mechanical process, a series of discrete steps […]
June 12, 2008

QUICK ON THE DRAW

Speaking of long articles worth reading, Vanity Fair has assembled a good oral history of the Internet to celebrate it’s 50th anniversary. How the web was won Leonard Kleinrock: September 2, 1969, is when the first I.M.P. was connected to the first host, and that happened at U.C.L.A. We didn’t even have a camera or a tape recorder or a written record of that event. I mean, who noticed? Nobody did. Nineteen sixty-nine was quite a year. Man on the moon. Woodstock. Mets won the World Series. Charles Manson starts killing these people here in Los Angeles. And the Internet was born. Well, the first four everybody knew about. Nobody knew about the Internet.
June 13, 2008

HARRY MARKRAM SPEAKS

I meant to post something on this a while ago, and never did, but let me save it for posterity. More on Blue Brain: “The column has been built and it runs,” Markram says. “Now we just have to scale it up.” Blue Brain scientists are confident that, at some point in the next few years, they will be able to start simulating an entire brain. “If we build this brain right, it will do everything,” Markram says. I ask him if that includes selfconsciousness: Is it really possible to put a ghost into a machine? “When I say everything, I mean everything,” he says, and a mischievous smile spreads across his face. He has a talent for speaking in eloquent soundbites, so that the most grandiose conjectures (“In ten years, this computer will be talking to us.”) are tossed off with a casual air. But then I notice, tucked in the corner of the room, is a small robot. The machine is about the size of a microwave, and consists of a beige plastic tray filled with a variety of test tubes and a delicate metal claw holding a pipette. The claw is constantly moving back and forth across the tray, taking tiny sips from its buffet of different liquids. I ask Schürmann what the robot is doing. “Right now,” he says, “it’s recording from a cell. It does this 24 hours a day, seven days a week. It doesn’t sleep and it never gets frustrated. It’s the perfect postdoc.” The science behind the robotic experiments is straightforward. The Blue Brain team genetically engineers Chinese hamster ovary cells to express a single type of ion channel—the brain contains more than 30 different types of channels—then they subject the cells to a variety of physiological conditions. That’s when the robot […]
June 13, 2008

FEEL THE LOVE

The Soul in the Machine When I was ushered into the room, the professor motioned me to a chair, his hands playing nervously, his shoulders rising with each breath. “Ask me anything you like,” he said, fixing me with an intent look, before staring at the floor despondently when I began to chuckle. “How many actuators do you have?” I said. “I have 50 pneumatic actuators in my upper body, including 17 in my head, five of which I use to move my lips for speech, and four activitators to make my shoulder move in a natural fashion.” “Do you believe in God?” “Um, er…,”: Ishiguro put his finger to his face in embarrassment. “Good question. Maybe you should ask the professor that one?” The “professor” was being operated in a nearby room by a young research assistant. I met the real Ishiguro the next day. He argued that Japan’s easy acceptance of robots had religious roots. In both Buddhism and Shintoism, the soul is everywhere and “just as we don’t distinguish between humans and rocks, so we don’t distinguish between humans and robots.” By contrast, Honda had sought the Vatican’s advice ten years ago before introducing Asimo’s forerunner to Europe. … In Japan people “feel love for robots”, as Doc put it, and want to care for them. “We Japanese want to live alongside robots.” They give robots human qualities–kawaii, “cute”, is perhaps Japan’s most squealed word. Robots are not threatening or alienating, they create feelings of security, comfort and companionship. Their cuteness tips over into the cloying. Don’t misunderstand me. I was not taken with Western notions of robots as a threat–of Daleks and Terminators. But I could take them or leave them.
June 13, 2008

FALL IN LINE

Robot Swarms Invade Kentucky One thing that the robots don’t know yet is how to define boundaries of the network, so they often spread out from the center and then get disconnected. The robots can communicate via one another (they know the neighbors, but don’t know about everybody else) but not with everybody at once. So if they need to find a robot that is not in their neighborhood, they must relay the info via their neighbors. To find the answer, they go around and query one another to find the result. The robot that is searching just goes around and asks a robot next to him. The network reconfigures in real-time and the robot is going to move around the network until it finds the robot in question. They can also form protective areas/fences. And, of course, they can also leave the planet in orderly fashion, so McLurkin has his robots leave the stage by ID. Two special robots know they are special and the rest know that they are ordinary. So they query all neighbors about their ID and then place themselves between the two neighbors—one that has a greater id than them and one that has a lower id than them—until the whole “squad” is arranged.
June 13, 2008

THE VITAL FORCE

Check this out (Thanks Steve!) Insight into how we tell whether something’s alive When viewers see the unscrambled pictures, they readily discern whether the point-light display represents a living thing or a random moving pattern. In fact, the task is so easy that it’s not actually very useful for researchers trying to understand the visual system. What Chang and Troje want to know is whether viewers use a “local” system or a “global” system to identify biological motion. In other words, are viewers looking at an isolated part of the display like the human’s ankles, or are they considering the concerted motion of all the points together? … Other research has found that the motion of the ankle appears to be a key in identifying biological motion. This may be because nearly all walking vertebrates swing their legs forward in a similar manner: they don’t actually use their muscles, but instead simply rely on gravity, thus conserving energy. Chang and Troje speculate that perhaps it is this distinctive arc that viewers focus in on when they identify biological motion.
.twitter-timeline.twitter-timeline-rendered { position: relative !important; left: 50%; transform: translate(-50%, 0); }