July 5, 2011

INTERNET NEWS TRAFFIC SPIKES AS CASEY ANTHONY VERDICT ANNOUNCED

The verdict in the State of Florida vs. Casey Anthony murder trial coincided with a spike in online news traffic. Content delivery network Akamai tells us that it saw a spike in its Net Usage Index for News around the time of the verdict. As the verdict was announced, news site pageviews jumped from about 2 million to nearly 3.3 million a minute — nearly all of that coming from the U.S. CNN saw an online traffic spike as well. The network tells us that more than 1 million users were watching CNN.com/live between 2:00 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. This was 30 times higher than the prior four-week average. CNN.com (which syndicates Mashable content) also experienced a surge in regular web traffic, with 12 million pageviews — four times the four-week average — on the site during the hour the verdict was announced. Twenty-five-year-old Anthony was found not guilty of the murder of her 2-year-old daughter. Anthony’s trial lasted nearly six weeks, but the case itself has been a big part of cable news for the past three years. The Anthony trial was streamed online as much as broadcast on cable TV. This allowed individuals to tune in from work and to comment using social media in real time. More About: akamai, casey anthony, court rulings For more Media coverage: Follow Mashable Media on Twitter Become a Fan on Facebook Subscribe to the Media channel Download our free apps for Android, Mac, iPhone and iPad
July 5, 2011

YOU MAY BE ABLE TO WATCH NETFLIX VIDEOS ON THE WII U CONTROLLER

Nintendo’s next-gen console, the Wii U, has a big old screen on its controller. It’s already known that it’ll be used for playing games, but it could also be used to play video, such as streaming movies from Netflix.
July 5, 2011

WHAT PEOPLE LOOK LIKE WHEN THEY’RE USING THE COMPUTER [VIDEO]

Click here to read What People Look Like When They’re Using the Computer Kyle McDonald, an artist, installed software that would grab pictures of people’s faces while they were using a public computer. It’s sorta creepy and invasive but also gives a unique look at how weird you look when you’re on the computer. More »
May 17, 2011

STREUTH! AUSSIE ROBOTS ARE BEING TAUGHT THEIR VERY OWN SPOKEN LANGUAGE [ROBOTS]

Click here to read Streuth! Aussie Robots are Being Taught Their Very Own Spoken Language And I don’t just mean a particularly-bogan strain of Orrstrayan, either. Researchers at two Queensland universities are creating a robot lexicon for a new language spoken purely by the shiny metal-bummed ‘bots, which have been dubbed the Lingodroids. Makes sense. More »
May 2, 2011

TACTILE KISS TRANSMISSION DEVICE FINALLY MAKES IT OKAY TO SMOOCH YOUR COMPUTER (VIDEO)

They say the vast majority of communication is done physically rather than verbally, but in the realm of technological advances we seem to have rather neglected the transmission of physical contact. Thankfully, there’s always Japan to provide us with off-the-wall innovations, this latest one being a kiss transmission device that will record, relay, and — if you wish it — replay your finest tongue gymnastics. It’s the height of simplicity at the moment, with a plastic implement taking input from one person’s mouth and conveying it to a second box, intended to be gobbled up by the recipient of this techno-affection, who may respond in kind or just sit back and enjoy the thrill of it. The researchers sagely point out that there’s more to be done, as the sense of taste, manner of breathing, and moistness of the tongue are all important aspects of a kiss that have yet to be recreated. Once they do get their kiss transmitter to v2.0, however, they envision a pretty neat market for it in reselling kiss replays performed by celebrities. For now, you can see a celeb-free video demo after the break. Continue reading Tactile kiss transmission device finally makes it okay to smooch your computer (video) Tactile kiss transmission device finally makes it okay to smooch your computer (video) originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 02 May 2011 03:47:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds. Permalink | source DigInfo | Email this | Comments
May 2, 2011

HERE’S THE GUY WHO UNWITTINGLY LIVE-TWEETED THE RAID ON BIN LADEN

Yesterday Sohaib Athar (@ReallyVirtual on Twitter) was just a an IT consultant taking a break from the rat-race by hiding in the mountains, …
April 14, 2011

HTTP://WWW.YOUTUBE.COM/WATCH?V=BUDLAGH1A0OEVERYTHING ABOUT

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BudlaGh1A0o Everything about this is awesome.
April 11, 2011

RESHARED POST FROM ANDREAS SCHOU

Deus ex machina Arnold Gehlen made a note of the relationship between mysticism and mechanical fascination in his 1957 Die Seele im technischen Zeitalter. I use a selection for my class that might interest you. https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B4me4PbBMBmON3h0T1pON1V0TVk/edit “The fascination with automatisms is a prerational, transpractical impulse, which previously, for millennia, found expression in magic– the technique of things and processes beyond our senses– and has more recently found its full realization in clocks, engines, and all manner of rotating mechanisms. Whoever considers from a psychological viewpoint the magic which cars exercise upon today’s young, cannot doubt that the interests appealed to lie deeper than those of a rational and practical nature. If this seems improbable, one should consider the fact that a machine’s automatism exercises a fascination entirely independent of its practical uses, a fascination that might well be best embodied in a perpetual motion machine whose only goal and activity would consist in forever reproducing the same circular motion. None of the innumerable individuals who over the centuries have grappled with the insoluble problem of perpetual motion, did so in view of any practical effect. Instead, they were all fascinated by the singular appeal of a machine that runs itself, a clock that winds itself. Such an appeal is not merely intellectual in nature, but has deeper sources.” Gehlen goes on to talk about magic and supernatural belief as a kind of ineffective technology. We’ve happened to create working technology with modern science, but our relationship with machines is still drenched in mysticism. cf. “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic” – A. Clarke. Andreas Schou originally shared this post: The American northeast was a weird place in the mid-1800s. The Speaker of Vermont’s House was an avid theosophist. Central Pennsylvania was populated by dissident German pietists. Joseph Smith […]
March 30, 2011

THIS ROBOTIC DRAGONFLY FLEW 40 YEARS AGO

This is a robotic dragonfly. If I told you that some company had just invented it and it was flying around today, you’d probably be impressed. Instead, I’m going to tell you that it was developed by the CIA and was flying in the 1970s. And not just flying like proof-of-concept-it-gets-off-the-ground flying, but reportedly, the flight tests were ‘impressive,’ whatever that means. It was powered by an ultraminiaturized gasoline engine (!) that would vent its exhaust backwards to increase the bot’s thrust, and the only reason they seemed to have scrapped it was that its performance in a crosswind wasn’t that good: In the 1970s the CIA had developed a miniature listening device that needed a delivery system, so the agency’s scientists looked at building a bumblebee to carry it. They found, however, that the bumblebee was erratic in flight, so the idea was scrapped. An amateur entymologist on the project then suggested a dragonfly and a prototype was built that became the first flight of an insect-sized machine. A laser beam steered the dragonfly and a watchmaker on the project crafted a miniature oscillating engine so the wings beat, and the fuel bladder carried liquid propellant. Despite such ingenuity, the project team lost control over the dragonfly in even a gentle wind. “You watch them in nature, they’ll catch a breeze and ride with it. We, of course, needed it to fly to a target. So they were never deployed operationally, but this is a one-of-a-kind piece.” In of itself, this dragonfly is not particularly crazy. It’s also not particularly crazy that it was done 30 or 40 years ago, I guess. What IS crazy is when you start thinking about the state of technology 40 years ago versus the state of technology today, and what might be possible […]
March 30, 2011

COOL TECHNOLOGY: ROBOTIC CLOUDS FOR QATAR WORLD CUP IN 2022 – CAPITAL WEATHER GANG – THE WASHINGTON POST

Shared by Daniel damn When the soccer World Cup comes to Qatar in June 2022, heat ranks high as a concern for the comfort and safety of both players and spectators. The small middle eastern nation’s high temperature averages around 105-110 when the Cup is currently scheduled be played. Enter scientists at Qatar University who say they will develop remote-controlled robotic clouds to float above desert stadiums, blocking the blazing sun and cooling temperatures by up to 10 degrees.
March 30, 2011

COOL TECHNOLOGY: ROBOTIC CLOUDS FOR QATAR WORLD CUP IN 2022 – CAPITAL WEATHER GANG – THE WASHINGTON POST

Shared by Daniel damn When the soccer World Cup comes to Qatar in June 2022, heat ranks high as a concern for the comfort and safety of both players and spectators. The small middle eastern nation’s high temperature averages around 105-110 when the Cup is currently scheduled be played. Enter scientists at Qatar University who say they will develop remote-controlled robotic clouds to float above desert stadiums, blocking the blazing sun and cooling temperatures by up to 10 degrees.
March 25, 2011

(TITLE UNKNOWN)

Shared by Daniel This. Always this.
June 13, 2008

PENTAFLOPS

Roadrunner supercomputer puts research at a new scale On Saturday, Los Alamos researchers used PetaVision to model more than a billion visual neurons surpassing the scale of 1 quadrillion computations a second (a petaflop/s). On Monday scientists used PetaVision to reach a new computing performance record of 1.144 petaflop/s. The achievement throws open the door to eventually achieving human-like cognitive performance in electronic computers. PetaVision only requires single precision arithmetic, whereas the official LINPACK code used to officially verify Roadrunner’s speed uses double precision arithmetic. “Roadrunner ushers in a new era for science at Los Alamos National Laboratory,” said Terry Wallace, associate director for Science, Technology and Engineering at Los Alamos. “Just a week after formal introduction of the machine to the world, we are already doing computational tasks that existed only in the realm of imagination a year ago.” PetaVision models the human visual system—mimicking more than 1 billion visual neurons and trillions of synapses. Both my phil mind and phil tech class are ridiculously out of date. (Thx Steve via /.)
June 17, 2008

THEREFORE, MACHINES CANNOT THINK

The Death of Alan Turing
July 20, 2008

CANT STOP NOW

this is bat country
August 11, 2008

NUDGE

Ran into this quote from Whitehead: It is a profoundly erroneous truism, repeated by all copy-books and by eminent people when they are making speeches, that we should cultivate the habit of thinking of what we are doing. The precise opposite is the case. Civilisation advances by extending the number of operations we can perform without thinking about them. From Alfred North Whitehead’s An Introduction to Mathematics, p. 61. There is an echo of this sentiment in Turing’s approach to artificial intelligence. In any case, I found this quote on the Nudge blog, based on a book by Thaler and Sunstein. A nudge is any environmental cue that disposes a person to a particular response. They describe it like this: By a nudge we mean anything that influences our choices. A school cafeteria might try to nudge kids toward good diets by putting the healthiest foods at front. We think that it’s time for institutions, including government, to become much more user-friendly by enlisting the science of choice to make life easier for people and by gentling nudging them in directions that will make their lives better. They call their position ‘libertarian paternalism’ (ugh), and it is all about limiting control in particular ways without compromising freedom of choice. More specifically, it is about how to design environments that foster intelligent decision making. This might be one of those dangerous ideas, but when have you ever had a reason to distrust a Chicago economist? Some examples and a lecture below. Social cues are particularly salient nudges, but our machines are getting better at providing motivational feedback. I really like traffic examples as a case of almost seamless human-machine-infrastructure integration, which works really well in the ‘nudge’ vocabulary. For instance: If white lines are removed from the centre of a road, […]
August 18, 2008

CHANGES TO THE BLOG ROLL

Futile Podcast has escaped the shackles of Blogspot and moved to its new home of Granate Seed. My sister Nikki has also started a blog chronicling the Completed Martin Family. Putting it on the Blogroll will make me check it more often.
August 19, 2008

EVERYTHING IS MISCELLANEOUS

This is really old in internet time, but I just watched it now and it is definitely worth it. David Weinberger is a philosopher by training, and tells basically the same Aristotle to Heidegger story I tell in my own class. See also: Ontology is Overrated and Information R/Evolution. Coming up: The Three Pillars of the Internet Age.
August 19, 2008

THE THREE PILLARS

The eventual theoretical foundation of Internet Studies ™ combines the collapse of ontology with an integrated and consistent set of nudges and an active and self-sustaining community of spimes. Let’s call these the Three Pillars of the Internet Age. These pillars are bound together by what I will call a participatory framework. Internet studies differ from other “studies” disciplines (media studies, gender studies, etc) in that the protocols which govern the interactions between entities within a participatory framework are well-defined, and in most cases are explicit and formal (for instance, IP describes (at some level of analysis) the communication between all networked objects). Exchanges between entities within the framework are interactive, interoperable, and cooperative, and hence they are participatory. Internet studies is also far more interested with the possibilities made available by the infrastructure that supports the participatory framework, than in any particularly realization of those possibilities. For instance, Internet Studies is interested in the question, “what is a blog?”, and what kinds of communication, social organization, and information distribution possibilities that this kind of resource makes available, and is less interested in a question like “How has DKos changed the political climate in 2008?” which in some sense is merely a specific application of the more general social protocol. I’ll talk just a bit more about the three pillars below. Pillar One: Everything Is Miscellaneous Collapsing ontology (more specifically, collapsing the distinction between data and metadata) as described by Weinberger and Shirky yields a minimalist ontology that is unsustainable by human minds alone. This in itself is nothing new; we have always used external frameworks for structuring our knowledge. The organization of libraries is a paradigmatic case of using external resources (shelves, numbering systems) to help structure and support our organizational techniques. What changes with the a mature internet […]
October 1, 2008

A CONVERSATION WITH DAVID PESCOWITZ

If one of the fundamental problems of the technological world is the explosion of information, then it seems to me that the task of ‘sensemaking’ is a burden that must be taken up by both humans and machines. This is where the real power of human-machine collaboration lies: machines are not just tools to be used by humans, but are fellow sensemakers confronting a VUCA world alongside us. Cognitive enhancements, memory and attention drugs, and so on, look like pissing in the wind compared to the overwhelming amounts of information produced by the collective. At best, it seems that these enhancements help the individual mind focus on the information relevant to the goals and projects of the individual mind, and to mask off the unimportant or uninteresting information. Perhaps this leads to a certain amount of individual empowerment, but it still leaves mountains of (possibly relevant) data untouched, and therefore doesn’t solve the problem. Perhaps I am using the term ‘sensemaking’ to be more or less synonymous with terms like ‘interpreting’ or ‘understanding’, and maybe this isn’t exactly what you mean. But my idea is that our machines themselves will play a role in helping to determine what is important or interesting. This is why I said that Google is itself a sensemaker, because it has the goal of sorting out what is relevant and what is irrelevant. As you rightly point out, Google isn’t terribly good at the task, and the user must use their own judgment in how to make use of the results Google makes available. But Google is already good enough that even the unenhanced individual doesn’t have too much trouble, with a moderate amount of training, to make a decent judgment call. The upshot is that with the collaboration of sensemakers like Google, we have […]
October 4, 2008

POSSESSED

… and when they have observ’d, that the principal disturbance in society arises from those goods, which we call external, and from their looseness and easy transition from one person to another; they must seek for a remedy by putting these goods, as far as possible, on the same footing with the fix’d and constant advantages of the mind and body. – Hume, Treatise
October 22, 2008

ROBOCALLS

On Jay Leve, the guy behind SurveyUSA All these polls were being conducted in a bedroom-sized chamber just outside Leve’s door called “the vault,” in recognition of its actual use back when a rare-coins dealer owned the space. Leve led me inside, and pointed to a corner. “We even kept one of his safes,” he said with a smile. Leve doesn’t use the old steel safe, but the vault is still an apt name because it currently guards the workhorses of Leve’s business: a set of black IBM calling machines, each about the size of a stereo tuner and stacked horizontally in a pair of large metal cabinets. Each machine is capable of having as many as 288 phone lines plugged into its back, creating a messy tangle of multicolored wires running from the machines up into the ceiling. On a busy day, Leve explained, his machines might place a few hundred thousand calls for 30 different polls. (For this election, he is polling in 28 states.) Since Leve began conducting surveys in 1992, his machines have completed 24 million interviews. Leve, for his part, can be withering about the establishment that rejects him. He bridles at the commonly used term “robo-calling” as a label for what he does. “It could not be a more offensive term,” he says. “It literally is like using the N-word.”
.twitter-timeline.twitter-timeline-rendered { position: relative !important; left: 50%; transform: translate(-50%, 0); }