February 20, 2011

KEN JENNINGS TALKS ABOUT LOSING TO WATSON, BEING HUMAN AFTER ALL

In a piece for Slate titled “My Puny Human Brain,” former-Jeopardy-greatest Ken Jennings talks briefly through his experience playing against IBM’s Watson. If you were hoping for some sour grapes, you won’t find it here, but Ken gives a great insight into what it feels like to be an underdog human up against a PR darling supercomputer. “Watson has lots in common with a top-ranked human Jeopardy! player: It’s very smart, very fast, speaks in an uneven monotone, and has never known the touch of a woman.” Ken wraps it up on an uplifting, humans-are-going-to-be-alright-after-all note, and we seem to have something in our eye… Ken Jennings talks about losing to Watson, being human after all originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:48:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds. Permalink | source Slate | Email this | Comments
February 18, 2011

UTTERLY RIDICULOUS ACTION SCENE FROM BOLLYWOOD ‘TERMINATOR’ KNOCKOFF

Shared by Daniel haha what the hell The insane epicness of this movie cannot possibly be overstated. And somehow, the fact that it’s overdubbed in Russian makes it just that much more awesome. It’s called Robot, and if you get a copy, send it to me. Immediately. Update: the full movie is here on YouTube (all 2+ hours of it), with English captions! VIA [ Laughing Squid ]
February 18, 2011

TED ROUNDUP: HEATHER KNIGHT AND CYNTHIA BREAZEAL TALK ROBOT COMEDY AND INTERACTIVITY

Watch these two TED Talks from robot researchers Heather Knight and Cynthia Breazeal, on interactive robot comedy and why we don’t have robots in our homes yet
February 13, 2011

JIEAB.JPG

February 12, 2011

A FUNDAMENTAL SHIFT

This thread is a mess, filled with too many analogies and lofty idealistic rhetoric that is appropriate to the dramatic circumstances but fail to help us think clearly through them. Forget this consciousness stuff, it isn’t helping. Let us start again. On the one hand, we have Uglycat arguing that we are experiencing a fundamental shift in social organization, a shift made possible by the democratizaton of incredibly powerful networked technologies. On the other hand, we have Petey’s much more moderate claim in the main Revolution thread: Petey posted: – social media played some unknown but presumably nontrivial role in both a) spreading the word about the self-immolations among sympathetic citizens and b) facilitating the organization of collective action protests I think everyone will agree with Petey about the nontrivial role of social media and internet organization. The operative question in this thread is what substantial role these new technologies have played, and does this represent a fundamental shift in the narrative, or is this just a continuation of old themes in slightly new packaging. I think the key to understanding this is being specific about what would count as a ‘fundamental’ shift. I’m going to point to Deep Hurting’s latest comic to give a sense of what fundamental means in this context. Ignore Deep Hurting’s political comment for a second, and just think about the appropriation of the famous painting of Lady Liberty in the throes of revolution, holding a smartphone in her outstretched hand. One of the distinguishing characteristics of the protestors today is their use of these social devices. It is a badge of self-identification, it distinguishes and marks off as unique the revolutions currrently underway from those in the past. The causes are the same (liberty), but the defenders of that cause are equipped differently. In […]
February 12, 2011

FIRESHOTPROCAPTURE011CL.PNG (403×447)

February 10, 2011

AHUMANRIGHT.ORG PLANS TO BUY SATELLITE AND PROVIDE FREE INTERNET ACCESS FOR ENTIRE WORLD

Shared by Daniel ht becca
January 24, 2011

A SOFTER WORLD: 633

January 24, 2011

AUTONOMOUS QUADROTOR TEAMS MAY BUILD YOUR NEXT HOUSE

Back in July, we wrote about how UPenn’s GRASP Lab had taught their quadrotors to work together to grasp and move things. The next step, it seems, is teaching the quadrotors to work together to grasp and move things and actually build buildings. The video above shows a team of quadrotors cooperating to construct the framework of a (rather small) building. The building’s structure is held together with magnets, and the quadrotors are able to verify that the alignment is correct by attempting to wiggle the structural components around, which is pretty cool. It’s fun to speculate about how this technology might grow out of the lab into the real world… To build actual buldings, you’d either need much bigger quadrotors (which is possible), lots of small quadrotors cooperating in big pieces (also possible), or buildings built out of much smaller components (which might be the way to go). The quadrotors probably wouldn’t be able to do all the work, but they have the potential to make construction projects significantly more efficient. [ GRASP ]
January 24, 2011

X-RHEX: RHEX GETS AN UPGRADE

It looks like that desert testing we wrote about in May of last year has paid off, and UPenn’s KodLab has developed a new version of their RHex wheeled/legged robot called X-RHex. X-RHex is about the same size and weight as RHex, but it’s stronger, more durable, and has as longer run time of up to two hours. It’s also got a couple mil-spec rails mounted on top along with standardized electrical connections, which could be just for convenience or could be because X-RHex has a probable military future, or both. X-RHex doesn’t seem as capable of the speeds exhibited by other leg/wheel hybrid robots such as Whegs, but its strength is in its adaptability and the way it can make it through basically any sort of terrain, even things that would challenge conventional wheeled or tracked robots. [ X-RHex ]
January 22, 2011

WINDORO THE WINDOW-CLEANING ROBOT – BOING BOING

December 15, 2010

STUMBLES PREVENT ROBO-SPRINTER FROM SPREADING ABJECT ‘TERMINATOR’ TERROR

The T-1000 shape-shifter robot in ‘Terminator 2’ serves as a terrifying upgrade over its Arnold predecessor. But, that intimidation doesn’t arise from its morphing capabilities, because the robot truly horrifies us when it breaks into — with those disturbing swinging arms — an emotionless, unflinching sprint. Well, finally, an engineer has decided real robots should possess those same stupefying skills. MIT scientist Ryuma Niiyama is developing a running robot, simply named ‘Athlete,’ that employs seven complex muscle systems. The artificial muscles, which mimic human sets like the gluteus maximus and the hamstring, power prosthetic blades similar to those utilized by amputee athletes. Embedded sensors and inertial measurement units monitor the bot’s orientation, so that it — conceivably — can maintain a steady, sickening sprint. Continue reading Stumbles Prevent Robo-Sprinter From Spreading Abject ‘Terminator’ Terror Stumbles Prevent Robo-Sprinter From Spreading Abject ‘Terminator’ Terror originally appeared on Switched on Wed, 15 Dec 2010 10:40:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds. Permalink | Email this | Comments
December 18, 2008

HE NEVER UNDERTSOOD IT

Bruno Latour, in conversation with Richard Powers, in honor of HAL: BL: To tell you the truth, I have never understood the Turing Test to begin with. In theory, it should match a flesh and blood human against a silicon machine. In practice however it matches a flesh and blood machine against a flesh and blood machine, so how could the test ever be negative? The distribution is different, I concede. On one side, you have one body explored by ten thousand biologists, cytologists, and neurologists, while on the other side you have one computer concentrating the brain power of ten thousand engineers, software writers, and wafer printers. But how can any Turing Test judge hope to disentangle these two collections? The idea of a test matching a naked, isolated intelligent human against an isolated naked automated machine seems to me as unrealistic as imagining than we are here alone talking through email “naturally”, “directly”, without any mediation. Things and people are too much intertwined to be partitioned before the test begins, especially to capture this most heavily equipped of all faculties: intelligence.
January 12, 2009

BIG IN JAPAN

From IEEE: Rise of the Machines via Moral Machines via Jon
January 13, 2009

OBJECTIFIED

January 21, 2009

YUP

Thanks Ian!
January 26, 2009

F&M

January 26, 2009

LET US BE HEARD

From Engadget: New York Representative Pete King is hoping that the US will soon have a law requiring that all cameraphones make a noise when they snap a picture as well. To that end, King has re-introduced the so-called “Camera Phone Predator Alert Act,” which was actually first introduced in 2007 but went nowhere at the time. The bill, as the name not-so-subtly suggests, aims to prevent folks from taking cameraphone pictures without others people’s knowledge by forcing the phones to make a sound that’s “audible within a reasonable radius” and not able to be disabled. More from Ars\, which includes this stat: a recent survey of over a thousand teenagers and young adults (13 through 26) revealed that a fifth of the teens queried have posted a digital photo or video of themselves in their complete or partial birthday suits on the Internet. A third of the latter group have done the same.
January 27, 2009

THE FUTURE

This is our future. Robot watch via Dvice
January 27, 2009

HOW TO ANNOY A PHILOSOPHER

Creationists declare war over the brain Basically, the Intelligent Design crowd is turning their sights towards neuroscience and philosophy of mind, resolute in the mission to revive Cartesian dualism with the goal of “nothing less than the overthrow of materialism and its cultural legacies”. Because, you know, they have already finished proving evolution wrong and they need something to occupy them until the second coming. However, look at the bright side. The evolution/creationism debate has spawned an entire cottage industry within academic philosophy to popularize contemporary thought and bring the basic arguments for evolution into the mainstream. I mean, Hume destroyed creationism as a plausible theory 200 years ago, but while this is common knowledge among professional philosophers it had never quite trickled down to the public, so the culture wasn’t already inoculated against these kinds of malicious memes. I suspect the same will happen for the contemporary philosophy of mind and cognitive neuroscience, which is lightyears ahead of the pseudo-Freudian psychology that most people use to explain human behavior. The popular discourse could use some serious updating, and the best way to do it is for a bunch of dualist whackjobs to make a stink and to get roundly shut down in the public square.
January 31, 2009

I THINK THE WORD IS HAMMER

January 31, 2009

I HAVE BEEN SAYING THIS FOR YEARS

New Study Shows Time Spent Online Important for Teen Development Results from the most extensive U.S. study on teens and their use of digital media show that America’s youth are developing important social and technical skills online – often in ways adults do not understand or value. “It might surprise parents to learn that it is not a waste of time for their teens to hang out online,” said Mizuko Ito, University of California, Irvine researcher and the report’s lead author. “There are myths about kids spending time online – that it is dangerous or making them lazy. But we found that spending time online is essential for young people to pick up the social and technical skills they need to be competent citizens in the digital age.”
.twitter-timeline.twitter-timeline-rendered { position: relative !important; left: 50%; transform: translate(-50%, 0); }