November 30, 2010

ENGADGET EXPLAINS NET NEUTRALITY — AND OUR FULL INTERVIEW WITH PROFESSOR TIM WU! — ENGADGET

Shared by Daniel Didn’t post this when it originally came out, but the Tim Wu interview is really quite excellent. Posting now for posterity. Still trying to get up to speed on the whole net neutrality situation? Check out the intro above for a recap of the basics —
November 29, 2010

MEKA, UT AUSTIN RESEARCHERS SHOW OFF ‘SOCIABLE’ DREAMER ROBOT HEAD

The folks at UT Austin’s HCR Laboratory have been working on a Meka humanoid robot for some time now, but they’ve only just recently added one pretty significant component to it: a head. This so-called “Dreamer” isn’t just your ordinary robot head, though — described by the researchers as a “sociable humanoid head,” the head is modeled on anime and comic characters, and promises to establish an “organic link to its biological counterpart, creating feelings of quasi-affinity in response to gestures and synthetic emotions.” In other words, it’s impressive enough to hold your attention while you interact with it, and it may very well creep you out a little. Head on past the break to check it out in action. Continue reading Meka, UT Austin researchers show off ‘sociable’ Dreamer robot head Meka, UT Austin researchers show off ‘sociable’ Dreamer robot head originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:44:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds. Permalink | source HCR Laboratory | Email this | Comments
November 29, 2010

FANUC PICKER ROBOT GETS TURNED UP TO 11

You might remember this Fanuc pick and place robot from a post last year: https://youtu.be/czqn71NFa3Q Not bad, right? Well, since then someone’s gone and cranked it up to nutso: https://youtu.be/vkGCsi4dXcg Wow. Good thing sorting Skittles isn’t a real job, or I’d be looking at unemployment right now. [ FANUC ]
November 28, 2010

YOUTUBE – DINTERNET.AVI

Shared by Daniel h/t Ian. Fucking amazing. https://youtu.be/lWlRa6bU0Q8
November 26, 2010

HONG KONG TEAM STORES 90GB OF DATA IN 1G OF BACTERIA – SLASHDOT

Shared by Daniel h/t becca Bananana writes “A research team out of the Chinese University of Hong Kong has found a way to do data encryption and storage with bacteria. The project is called ‘Bioencryption,’ and their presentation (as a PDF file) is here.”…
November 26, 2010

ROBOT SOMEHOW BALANCES HINGED STICK

Shared by Daniel double pendulum what does it mean We’ve seen robots balancing sticks before, and it’s pretty cool… Since humans can do the same thing, there’s a limit to how impressive it can get. But just try finding a human who can balance a stick with a hinge in the middle: This thing gets even more awesome, because one commenter on the video asked (somewhat rhetorically) if the robot could do the same thing with a rope. Here’s what the author had to say: For a chain the stabilization is theoretical possible (a rope doesn’t has the needed compressive strength). Swing up of a chain should be possible with a feedforward control but probably not with an energy based approach. Just imagine how utterly crazy that would be… My mind is now preemptively blown. [ Vimeo ] VIA [ Reddit ]
November 25, 2010

WHEEME MASSAGE ROBOT WANTS TO EXPLORE YOUR CURVES

When you think of a massage robot, you probably think of something that’s humanoid, using hands to give a human a traditional massage. Robots, however, are best at being robots and doing things in robot-y ways, and all you really need for a massage is movement and pressure. WheeMe is a cute little robot that provides both by driving around your body on knobbly rubber wheels. At only 240 grams, WheeMe isn’t heavy enough to do a painful and fulfilling job, but I can imagine that it probably feels pretty good, at the very least like having someone run their fingers along your back. The especially clever bit about WheeMe is that it somehow knows how not to plunge to its death off of your shoulders… From the sound of things, it uses tilt sensors to keep its center of gravity in a safe place, but otherwise roams around more or less randomly. https://youtu.be/sBpg8ixEbCg WheeMe will be on display at CES in January, and we’ll be there to test it out (extensively) in person. There’s no word yet on price, but I can’t imagine it’ll be very expensive, although I’ve definitely been wrong about this kind of thing before. [ Dreambots ] VIA [ IEEE ]
November 21, 2010

CHESS TERMINATOR ROBOT ARM FACES OFF AGAINST FLESH AND BLOOD WORLD CHAMPION [VIDEO]

http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/11/160x120_k5jxmbafdsq.jpg Chess World Champion Vladimir Kramnik laughs it up in this video of his match against a merciless robot arm, but on the inside, like the rest of humanity, you can see the growing sense of dread. We are doomed. More »
November 20, 2010

CONFESSIONS OF AN ACA/FAN: ARCHIVES: MULTITASKING AND CONTINUOUS PARTIAL ATTENTION: AN INTERVIEW WITH LINDA STONE (PART ONE)

November 18, 2010

INTERVIEW WITH BRUCE STERLING, PART I: AT THE 9AM OF THE AUGMENTED REALITY INDUSTRY, ARE2010 | UGOTRADE

Shared by Daniel If Sterling got Turing wrong, then maybe my dissertation is important after all. Here’s what AI looks like in spime-world: ubiquitous wrangling. Bruce Sterling: Yeah, well, unless they’re going to invent mechanical eyeballs that those machines can fit onto, it’s going to be tough. OK, I’m a skeptic, but I’m prepared to be surprised. I’m also a skeptic in Artificial Intelligence, but as soon as they bring me an AI that can write a decent novel, I’m going to get it and review that book. [laughs] Tish Shute: It’s interesting. Re AI, I’m totally in agreement with you. In terms of the way computers turned out, it wasn’t AI per se that they turned out to be good for, not in the way everyone had dreamed of it, rather it was the harvesting of human intelligence that turned out to be the big thing. But what is interesting is that despite all of that, AI or machine learning, as it is now called, permeates our whole society now from the stock market to how many businesses make many of their decisions. Bruce Sterling: Well, there’s a lot of so-called collective intelligence. But Marvin Minsky-style hard AI, no way. Alan Turing-style AI, forget about that. Tish Shute: Yeah. So, that’s an interesting comparison with the HMDs. Bruce Sterling: People stretch the definitions. It’s like, well, my car engine is Artificial Intelligence. Yeah, so is your wall transistor. No, I don’t really think so.
November 16, 2010

ITTY BITTY JUMPING ROBOT GETS STEERING, TACKLES OBSTACLE COURSE

This video neatly demonstrates the utility of a jumping robot. EPFL’s jumper is simple, small, and cheap, but it’s able to rapidly negotiate an obstacle course that would be otherwise impassible by anything except a flying robot. The robot plus its self-righting roll cage weighs 14 grams and measures 18 centimeters in diameter. It can jump over 60 centimeters high, which at over four times its own height, is definitely respectable. To steer, the jumping part of the robot is actually able to rotate around inside its roll cage to launch in any direction. Simple but effective. I remember back in early 2008 when we first posted about this robot, and I wrote: “Yes, it’s not exactly controllable. And yes, it doesn’t exactly land right-side up. But these are minor quibbles, and they’re being worked on.” Quibbles solved. Nice job, EPFL. Now just make it fly… [ EPFL ]
November 16, 2010

OBAMA SQUEEZES PARO, BACKS AWAY FROM HRP-4C

We know that President Obama likes robots. We also know that President Obama is (at least little) scared of robots. On his recent trip to Japan, Barack came face to face with both Paro and HRP-4C, and it goes just about how you’d expect: I’m with ya, buddy… Just back away slowly or she’ll snap your neck. VIA [ CrunchGear ]
March 17, 2009

INSTINCT

Mistrial by iPhone: Juries’ Web Research Upends Trials (NYT) Last week, a juror in a big federal drug trial in Florida admitted to the judge that he had been doing research on the case on the Internet, directly violating the judge’s instructions and centuries of legal rules. But when the judge questioned the rest of the jury, he got an even bigger shock. Eight other jurors had been doing the same thing. The federal judge, William J. Zloch, had no choice but to declare a mistrial, wasting eight weeks of work by federal prosecutors and defense lawyers. “We were stunned,” said the defense lawyer, Peter Raben, who was told by the jury that he was on the verge of winning the case. “It’s the first time modern technology struck us in that fashion, and it hit us right over the head.” It might be called a Google mistrial. The use of BlackBerrys and iPhones by jurors gathering and sending out information about cases is wreaking havoc on trials around the country, upending deliberations and infuriating judges. Jurors are not supposed to seek information outside of the courtroom. They are required to reach a verdict based only on the facts that the judge has decided are admissible, and they are not supposed to see evidence that has been excluded as prejudicial. But now, using their cellphones, they can look up the name of a defendant on the Web, or examine an intersection using Google Maps, violating the legal system’s complex rules of evidence. They can also tell their friends what is happening in the jury room, though they are supposed to keep their opinions and deliberations secret. A juror on a lunch or bathroom break can find out many details about a case. Wikipedia can help explain the technology underlying a […]
March 28, 2009

I SPENT SPRING BREAK THINKING ABOUT THE SINGULARITY

Discussing the singularity is often confusing because it makes claims about both technology and artificial intelligence, and its hard to see how the two fit together. In fact, some philosophers have argued that technology is entirely irrelevant to studying the mind using the techniques of artificial intelligence. The idea is that cognitive science is medium independent; it doesn’t matter if you run the program on my laptop or yours or a computer 10 years old, its the same program that can be explained by the same theory. So success in artificial intelligence is theoretically independent of technological advances. I don’t think anyone buys this story any more, but it raises the issue of exactly how the two are related. It is a long story, but this is how I see it: Machines can perform certain tasks better than people. When they do, we often replace the human labor with their machine counterpart. This has been part of the history of technology. Most advances in technology involve machines that can move faster, or stronger, or more durably than people. These machines don’t have to be ‘smart’, although they might be improved by making them smarter. But with the advent of computers, machines started processing information. And the going theory is that the human brain also operates as a kind of information processing machine. That doesn’t mean the human brain is a computer, or that computers are brains. It just means the two are explained by the same basic theory. And in fact, we can get computers to simulate various aspects of the information-processing routines that brains perform. Computer vision is one of the wild successes of this paradigm. The ‘singularity’ supposedly hits when computers are equivalent to the human brain. Why is this event special? Well, what does it mean for […]
March 28, 2009

ALSO, ON CORY DOCTOROW

Cory Doctorow gave the best speech hands down at the Singularity Summit a few years ago. But he isn’t really talking about the singularity; its pretty clear he just sees it as a beacon that attracts the similarly technologically inclined, perhaps as a means to form an interest group that takes digital rights seriously. He specifically mentions looking for a word to unite the ‘movement’. As it happens, one of my favorite discussions on this blog was about this very question. Anyone have any new ideas? I think the transhumanist terms of the singularity aren’t very good for what Cory is after; if we are inseparably twined with technology it doesn’t make for a good object of devotion. I have grown less partial to “artifaithful” over time.
March 28, 2009

ONE MORE

http://www.viruscomix.com/anchoviescience.jpg
March 30, 2009

1978

April 2, 2009

WHY DO I BOTHER

when it is so obvious I am right? From Robot Scientists Think for Themselves At Aberystwyth University in Wales, Ross King and colleagues have created a robot called Adam that can not only carry out experiments on yeast metabolism but also reason about the results and plan the next experiment. It is the world’s first example of a machine that has made an independent scientific discovery — in this case, new facts about the genetic make-up of baker’s yeast. “On its own it can think of hypotheses and then do the experiments, and we’ve checked that it’s got the results correct,” King said in an interview. “People have been working on this since the 1960s. When we first sent robots to Mars, they really dreamt of the robots doing their own experiments on Mars. After 40 or 50 years, we’ve now got the capability to do that.” Here’s the link to the article in Science, for posterity. edit: Thanks, Schaaf!
April 7, 2009

KILL IIIIIITTTTT

April 11, 2009

:)

Tweenbots (via Gizmodo via Lally) The Tweenbot’s unexpected presence in the city created an unfolding narrative that spoke not simply to the vastness of city space and to the journey of a human-assisted robot, but also to the power of a simple technological object to create a complex network powered by human intelligence and asynchronous interactions. But of more interest to me was the fact that this ad-hoc crowdsourcing was driven primarily by human empathy for an anthropomorphized object. The journey the Tweenbots take each time they are released in the city becomes a story of people’s willingness to engage with a creature that mirrors human characteristics of vulnerability, of being lost, and of having intention without the means of achieving its goal alone. As each encounter with a helpful pedestrian takes the robot one step closer to attaining it’s destination, the significance of our random discoveries and individual actions accumulates into a story about a vast space made small by an even smaller robot. Video after the break.
April 22, 2009

THESE PENGUINS DID NOT MURDER ANYONE

Bionic penguins take to the water – and the skies Thx Bill!
April 24, 2009

REDESIGN MY SITE!

I’ve upgraded my wordpress install and reskinned the website, and as you can see I need to make some new title bars to give the blog the character and style it deserves. The theme I am using (Atahualpa) is just incredible, and it will let me cycle through title images. I want to generate a few of them to keep the site interesting. So help me out! Post some pictures of robots, technology, internet, science and anything else you think is appropriate for the site. Leave links in the comments, and I’ll do my best to work them into a title theme. Thanks for your patience.
.twitter-timeline.twitter-timeline-rendered { position: relative !important; left: 50%; transform: translate(-50%, 0); }